Regain of Arm and Hand Movements in Cervical Spinal Stimulation

Technology
Arm/hand function
Online since 4 September 2025, updated 90 days ago

About this trial

We will develop a "bottom to top" approach employing animal models and human testing to determine whether or not non-invasive neuro-modulation of the cervical spinal cord concomitant with upper limb r...

Included participants

Gender
All
Age
18 - 75 years
Injury level
C1 - T1
  • Severity (AIS)?
  • AIS-A
    AIS-B
    AIS-C
    AIS-D
    Time since injury
    3 months - 12 months
  • Injury type
  • Traumatic

    Non-traumatic

    Healthy volunteers
    No
    C1-T1
    Additionally, participants must
    NOT have peacemakers or electronic implants

    What’s involved

    Type

    Technology

    Details

    Patient selection criteria: The study will consist of two populations of patients: Population A will include a total of 10-15 patients with an incomplete cervical lesion (ASIA C and D), and a population B, with 8-15 patients with a complete motor cervical injury (ASIA A and B). Patients from both populations will have ages between 18 and 60 years, with a level of injury between C5 and T1 and with more than 12 months of evolution since the onset of the injury. Experimental design: Selected patients from both populations (A and B) will be included in one of the following groups: Group 1: Patients will receive conventional sensory-motor rehabilitation regimen of the upper limb concomitant; Group 2. Patients will receive conventional rehabilitation concomitant with transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Group 3: Patients will have exo-skeleton driven arm rehabilitation concomitant with transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Each session will last 40 minutes and will be done daily during the 6 weeks of evaluation. Cervical transcutaneous stimulation protocol: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be applied by an external set of electrodes, which will be placed on the skin in the midline between the spinous processes of C6 and C8. Two rectangular plates (5.0 x 10.2 cm2) are placed on the skin of the shoulder blades and act as anodes. The electrical stimulation consist of monopolar pulse trains of 1 millisecond duration, released at a frequency of 10 kHz and at an intensity ranging from 80 to 180 mA. Each pulse train is presented at a frequency of 100Hz (ref 8). The stimulation intensity will be adjusted to 90% of the threshold to evoke contractions of the muscles. Rehabilitation of the upper limb. Conventional rehabilitation consists in voluntary, or assisted by a physical therapist, to manually articulate the upper extremities. Patients will perform motor and voluntary rehabilitation of the arms and hands to manipulate objects, performing exercises of grip, endurance and dexterity (ref 9) Robotic upper limb rehabilitation program. By means of custom-made robotic exo-skeleton patients will move a joystick by a board, following a pattern presented on a television screen. The robot has a sensory feed back system, by which the regain of voluntary movements by the patients will decrease the force exerted by the exo-skeleton to move the arm. Patients will be included in the same number and length of sessions as the conventional rehabilitation regime. Neurological and functional evaluation. To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, prior to the initiation of rehabilitation, and once a month until the end of the study, a series of neurological, functional and daily life activities (ref 10) will be performed to evaluate the Effects of spinal stimulation on the motor control of the arms and hands. In addition, prior to the start and the end of each program, motor evoked potentials will be evaluated from the motor cortex and the monoand poly-synaptic reflexes evoked after peripheral nerve stimulation, in order to evaluate the acute and long-term changes in The cortico-medullary and own-medullary connectivity induced by the electrical stimulation. Data analysis. Each patient will have previous and post-stimulation data. We will evaluate t-test between the different conditions, for each neurological and functional variable evaluated.

    Potential benefits

    Main benefits

    Arm/hand function

    Additional benefits

    General health

    Good to know: Potential benefits are defined as outcomes that are being measured during and/or after the trial.

    Wings for Life supports SCITrialsFinder

    Wings for Life has proudly initiated, led and funded the new version of the SCI Trials Finder website. Wings for Life aims to find a cure for spinal cord injuries. The not-for-profit foundation funds world-class scientific research and clinical trials around the globe.

    Learn more


    • Trial recruitment status
    • Ended
    • Trial start date
    • 1 Sep 2020
    • Organisation
    • Institut Guttmann
    • Trial recruitment status
    • Ended
    • Trial start date
    • 1 Sep 2020
    • Organisation
    • Institut Guttmann

    Wings for Life supports SCITrialsFinder

    Wings for Life has proudly initiated, led and funded the new version of the SCI Trials Finder website. Wings for Life aims to find a cure for spinal cord injuries. The not-for-profit foundation funds world-class scientific research and clinical trials around the globe.

    Learn more